Individuals who lose power or are out of power seek to increase their power
individually. If they fail to do so, then the alternative is to form a
coalition–an informal group bound together by the active pursuit of a single
issue. The natural way to gain influence is to become a power holder but this
may be difficult, risky, costly, or impossible.
Ø In such an event, efforts are
directed towards forming a coalition of two or more “outs” who, by coming
together, can combine their resources to increase rewards for themselves.
Successful coalitions have been found to contain fluid membership and are able
to form swiftly, achieve their target issue, and quickly disappear
disintegrate.
Ø There are a couple of
predictions about coalition formation. They are as follows:
Ø First, coalitions in
organizations often seek to maximize their size. Decision-making in
organizations does not end just with selection from among a set of
alternatives, but require to be implemented. The implementation of an
commitment to the decision is as important as the decision. It is essential for
coalitions within organizations to seek a broad constituency and there may be
expansion in coalition to help in consensus building.
Ø Another
prediction relates to the degree of interdependence within the organization.
More coalitions are likely be created where there is a great deal of task and
resource interdependence. In contrast, there will be less interdependence among
subunits and less coalition formation activity where subunits are largely
self-contained or resources are in plenty.
Ø Finally, coalition
formation will be influenced by the actual tasks that workers perform. In
general, the more routine the task of a group, the greater the likelihood that
coalitions will form.
No comments:
Post a Comment